Friday, December 31, 2010
Orange TH30 Review
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Parker Pt. 4: Ahead of the Times
This is part 4 in a 6 part series. Here are the links to the other parts:
The Parker I have in the house came in a box, and was packed in the most luxurious gig bag I’ve ever laid eyes on in person. Padded to the extreme is a little bit of an understatement with this guitar and I would personally feel safe lugging it around back and forth to gigs so long as nothing heavy was going to be on top of it. Inside the bag was a strap from XoX (who make a carbon fiber guitar called the Handle) and IT is the most luxurious strap I’ve ever seen too. Smooth and comfortable padded (on the interior of the strap) leather and it just… it, combined with the weight of the Parker make playing a piece of cake on the shoulder. It’s a very decadent strap.
Anyway, as I pulled the Parker out of the gig bag my wife (who doesn’t like the looks of the guitar) asked what was so special about this guitar.
I just smiled and started to regale her with just what makes this Parker so awesome.
Parker Guitars have been ahead of their time from the beginning and we’re seeing more and more companies either re-invent the innovations or adopt similar items into their own catalog.
See, Ken Parker said in an ad that has been ingrained my memory something along the lines of taking all the lessons he’s learned over years of building, modifying and repairing musicians’ instruments and made a guitar that is the next step. An innovation if you will.
And when you look at the guitar compared to a run of the mill guitar you’ll see the differences. The neck carve is conical so it feels just as good chording on one end of the neck as it does doing solos on the other, the fretboard is glass and carbon fiber which means slick, clean and comfortable playing with zero drag, the frets are hardened stainless steel which last two eternities back to back (and don’t seem to wear out normal strings – I’m pretty sure that’s a myth or builders like Tom Anderson, EVH and Parker wouldn’t use SS frets) and because the fretboard is part glass, the frets are glued on using a super strong glue because if Parker attempted to actually inlay the frets like you would a normal guitar, it would have damaged the structural integrity of the fretboard. Cutting a slot for a fret is something that could be done (providing you’re OK with losing the strength of the carbon/glass fingerboard) but only is you used either nickel or steel frets because with hardened stainless steel, there’s no way to make them with a tang for traditional installation.
There are those that might be scared about a fret that’s glued on, but in my limited experience with the brand, I would say that it’s not really something to be scared about.
Another feature is the incredible light weight. The guitar doesn’t feature a normal truss rod but a piano wire which weighs eighteen times less than what other guitar companies use. The weight of the guitar is also attributed to the incredibly thin body. This body causes a lot of hesitation on a player’s part because it feels fragile at first until you get used to it and then you realize it’s just as strong as any other guitar (indeed, stronger than most). The reason it’s so strong is because the back and back of the neck is wrapped in carbon fiber which is incredibly strong and this stabilizes the guitar so once you get over the weight it feels SOLID.
In addition to all that, the guitar features specifically made DiMarzio pickups and this is both pro and con. The pro is that the pickups are great and work well. The con is that changing pickups is borderline impossible because the guitar doesn’t feature pickup rings and the body isn’t deep enough to accommodate most pickups so the classic “change the pickups” mentality is pretty much dead from the start. Again, I don’t think the pickups are bad, so it’s kind of a non-issue to me, but I know there are a ton of tinkerers in the guitar community who will look at this in a negative light. To these people there are tempting reports of both DiMarzio and Seymour Duncan offering a service where they rewind the bobbins to match any of their other pickups. This is an unconfirmed report but it’s said that at the very least they USED to offer this service. Perhaps they still do. That should make the pickup swappers more accepting or at least a little more hopeful.
Past the pickups we come to the bridge and this is probably my favorite part (besides the steel frets which I love). The bridge is the exact radius of the neck so the distance from fretboard to string is the same with every string. This may not sound like a big deal but believe me, it’s a huge difference in playing. EVERY guitar benefits from this kind of detail. Once I changed the bridge on my Gretsch to one that had the same radius as the neck, playing became much easier and more fun and I was now able to lower the bridge as far as I wanted without the middle strings touching the fretboard.
The bridge’s wonder doesn’t stop there. It’s also a tremolo and operates in three ways that are all up to the player. Using the exposed wheel and a switch on the back of the guitar it can be either a stop-tail with no trem movement at all, or a downward only trem, or a free floating trem and while the range isn’t as crazy as a Floyd, it’s pretty nuts and certainly has more range than my Gretsch’s Bigsby tailpiece! And it looks good. AND it doesn’t have screws or wheels that fine-tune the strings that can easily be turned while palm muting and playing. In addition to ALL that, the trem doesn’t even require a locking nut, nor cutting the balls off of strings to restring or a twenty-minute string changing process (put it in stop tail mode and change the strings like you would any other through-body guitar). All the ease of stringing up a Tele, almost all the freedom a Floyd provides (and you don’t’ need to change guitars to do a song that features a lot of trem wanking and a song that features a lot of steel-guitar-ish bends, just a turn of the wheel and a flick of the switch!).
So the bridge is pretty awesome, right? And all with no off-the-shelf parts too.
BUT WAIT!
THERE’S MORE!
I know, it’s crazy, but this is the last huge bonus of the bridge: it features Piezo pickups.
For those NOT familiar with Piezo pickups they aren’t magnetic like normal pickups and make your electric guitar sound like an acoustic guitar (or very similar, anyway). The joy of the Parker’s layout is that you can have EITHER the magnetic Dimarzio pickups or the Piezo pickups or you can blend the two if you prefer.
The guitar features four/five knobs (one of the knobs is a two-tiered knob, hence the four OR five description) the first knob being a master volume effecting both the magnetic and Piezo pickups (which makes volume swells while both engaged possible). The knobs that follow are a magnetic pickup volume, a magnetic pickup tone, and the last being a Piezo volume/tone (again, it’s stacked so there are two knobs in one). It’s a pretty easy setup to learn and before you know it you’re blending pickups, shaping your tone and doing volume swells with the best of them.
Ken Parker also didn’t take away all the joy of modifying your guitar. The trem bar, made out of 3/16" stainless steel is hexagon shaped and malleable. This means that if you have an angle that you really like your trem bar to be at, you can bend (or have a tech bend) the bar and bend it to your specifications and make it the most comfortable trem bar you’ve ever used (it’s not made of hardened stainless steel like the frets which is why it’s bendable).
That’s a pretty sweet idea.
Additionally, on the SIDE of the guitar there’s a battery box (required for the Piezo), the output jack and a red button.
A red button?
Yes, a red button. This magical red button makes the guitar able to be played in either mono (through one amp) or stereo (through two amps).
So what does this mean to you? If you’re at a gig and you know that you use a clean/acoustic sound often or enough to worry about lugging an acoustic or changing either amps or channels on amps to accommodate this need, life just got a LITTLE bit easier. You can bring two amps and set one up with whatever gain setting you like (say, bass-heavy nu-metal goodness) and another amp with the best clean tone you have at your disposal. You get a Y cable and plug into both amps and push the button and when you mess with the Piezo switch you can operate one amp at a time or both at the same time. Now you can play a song with acoustic verses and bone-crushing choruses and you don’t have to worry about finding the pedal that changes channels on your amp nor do you have to rely on your amp having both amazing distortion AND clean tones! You can even play both at the same time filling up your sound and possibly replacing a second guitarist (especially if you mirror your playing parts relying on a difference in tone ONLY to craft your band’s sound). Don‘t think it’s limited to this night and day scenario either. Feel free to adjust as you see fit tweaking gain, amp settings, etc. The Parker is truly an instrument designed to let the voice of the player come out as easily as possible and the tonal possibilities are out of this world.
So, after telling my wife all this, she still looked unimpressed but then again, she’s not a guitar player. But YOU are (presumably) so you’re probably at the very least MILDLY impressed with all of these features packed into a guitar that still features clean lines, minimal knobs and switches, a non-confusing layout and strength and durability, right?
-Pappy
Monday, December 27, 2010
Shallow?
Friday, December 24, 2010
X-Mas
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Parker Pt. 3: Guitar Art
Monday, December 20, 2010
Ramblings
Friday, December 17, 2010
Mark Tremonti: The Sound And The Story
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Parker Pt. 2: Parker's History
Monday, December 13, 2010
Steve Vai is Yoda
Gig FX VOD Winner Announced!
Sunday, December 12, 2010
New Contest from Muzicosphere!
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Hearty Sponsor Recommendations




Friday, December 10, 2010
New George Harrison Gretsch
AmpliTube 3 Review
Welcome to the days of good amplifier simulation! It’s crazy to think that just a few short years ago amplifier purists were saying that modeling amps wouldn’t last, that they didn’t sound good and no one would buy them. Then it seemed like you couldn’t open a guitar magazine without reading that someone had recorded their latest album using Pro Tools, a digital recording platform. Still, purists and some outspoken musicians said that the tone was cold and lifeless - a practical zombie of guitar recording. Still the digital world refused to be smacked into submission and as a result we have a wealth of fairly affordable (if not completely free) recording platforms and amplifier simulation software that makes studios questionable and spare bedrooms and basements filled with gear more of a luxury than a necessity when you demand variety in tone.
But when it comes to recording on your own you’re looking for three basic things:
1) Either as much variety as possible or your favorite sound nailed perfectly in a digital world.
2) Affordability.
3) Ease of use.
IK Multimedia’s AmpliTube 3 introduces more amps than most studios have in the wings, and more complete set-ups that are ready to go if you’re in a hurry, or waiting to serve as a jumping-off point to find your tone.
And some of these tones are absolutely amazing. Especially the clean tones. Normally I go in to amp sims thinking that I’ll have to tweak this or that to get it to where I like it, but with AmpliTube’s clean sounds I found that all the tweaking I may need lay not in the software but merely changing which pickup I was using. The setting “Rockabilly & Swing” in particular really stands out because with a Telecaster in the middle position, even a beat-up Squier like mine that’s seen better days both in looks and tone, I was able to NAIL a Cliff Gallup tone. The delay and reverb that came with the setting was dialed in perfectly and the only thing I needed to tweak in the software was the volume.
Oh, and it was FUN. Playing in this setting I was seeing right away that your tone is a big part of song writing. I used to think you can write anything on anything and that may be true, but it’s a WHOLE lot easier to write a rockabilly song when you have a rockabilly sound in your ears when you’re writing.
Speaking of your ears, that’s another huge plus to this software: it won’t kill your ears. You can get a Twin-ish amp cranked up to 10, something that would make faces melt like in Raiders of the Lost Ark screaming “It hurts so much, but the TONE IS AWESOME!” but with a dead audience, it’s not like you’ll see many repeat patrons at your show (if you survive yourself). But with this you can set the volume that’s coming through your speakers/headphones and it’s even helped out more when you have a recording interface that has an output or monitor level.
There are so many things you can do, and so many tones you can achieve that you can literally spend days going through and finding the ones you like the most. Personally, I thought that the software excelled when there was no gain involved all the way up to an 80’s kind of gain. There are more extreme settings that tackle sounds like nu-metal or thrash, but as a setting template they don’t shine as much as the other settings.
But people familiar with amp sims will probably say that there’s no ONE program that can do everything and do it all perfectly and there are programs where certain tones are truly nailed at the expense of having a ton of different virtual amps to choose from. Some are better at high gain stuff, some are better at clean and some just plain attack one specific line of amps and get the closest approximation to the natural tones that they can (for example, Fender AmpliTube).
Of course this isn’t to say that you can’t tweak it to where you like your heavy sounds to be and I’m not really insulting IK for their interpretations of the heavier sounds of the late 90’s, especially when SO MANY other sounds offered are spot on and completely usable with little or no tweaking on your end. And there's a VERY important thing to remember here: I'm just reviewing the actual software and the included presets. You can tweak any amp, add any effect, mics, etc. etc. and spend hours if not DAYS finding the exact tone you like (and then saving it). Because of this, you can probably tweak your way to happiness with little or no problem, but there's no way I can review what YOU would do as a player.
The numbers for AmpliTube are staggering. Check it out:
51 stompbox effects
31 amp models
46 cabinet emulations
15 studio microphone models
17 rack effects
A high-precision tuner
And a slew of other stuff like the ability to move the microphone to different areas of the cab, room ambience, drag and drop functionality, a search function (which comes in handy with this many pieces of gear) and the ability to be expanded on with packages like AmpliTube Fender and Ampeg SVX.
So we can say that, provided you’re interested in either versatility or spot-on settings of clean to 80’s dirty tones, Number One of the magical shopping list is complete and good to go.
Moving on to two, the complete version of AmpliTube 3 costs $278.95 on Amazon.com and while it’s a little tough to look at a box that size and say “$300.00? Let’s do it!” consider what you’re getting. If only ONE sim sound nails what you’re looking for, you’ve probably saved a ton of money. For instance, I really like the sounds of the amp that looks suspiciously Marshall-ish and if that was the only amp I liked and used I would have saved WELL over a thousand bucks. That’s enough to justify the software AND the computer it runs on!
But yes, $300.00 is a little expensive but it isn’t out of the realm of affordability and even a teen with a job should be able to save up enough to buy this software with little difficulty.
So can we say Number Two is a success?
Well, then we move on to Number Three. Here’s where things get a little disappointing.
IK offers technical advice and seems to have their customers in mind when they make their products and are more than willing to help out should anything go wrong, but their user area seems to be devoid of one thing: A user forum. I found most of my helpful advice on the forum for my interface which isn’t made by IK, and some other tips on YouTube.
EDIT: IK Multimedia has just put out a User's Forum, so this complaint is now negated.
Actually setting it up to record and use my new interface (the interface was a tricky piece of equipment, especially for how simple it looks) and the software into GarageBand was a bit difficult but I will say once you learn it, it’s not like more problems come up. It’s just that initial familiarization that’s a bit of a pain but they always say that anything good is worth a bit of heartache and in the end, I learned how to use a piece of software that boasts more stuff inside it than can fit inside a guitar store and now that I’ve gone through that initial pain, it’s all right there at my fingertips, just waiting for me.
I wouldn’t normally complain about a learning period like this either if the company offered a tutorial or an online forum, but IK doesn’t. In a dream world, what I would like to see is the first time you use the software after registration, it takes you through the program giving you a quick tour of the ins and outs, helping make sure you know how to connect properly, select amps, stomboxes, move mics, record, etc. etc. This is something that you find in the beginning of a lot of video games and something that could be considered EXTREMELY valuable with programs of this depth.
In the end I’m incredibly pleased with the tone and price of the software. The tones are great and the price could be considered a steal when you even consider for a second the amount of great work you’re getting and the amount of great tones you’ll be able to use. The learning period is a bit rough, but any software that can do this amount of stuff is bound to have a similar familiarization process. In high school there was a full semester class on how to use Microsoft Word for crying out loud and I guarantee you, nothing nearly as cool came out of THAT program compared to AmpliTube 3.
So who should buy it?
Well, if you have a computer, are inclined to record yourself without lugging your stuff to a studio and paying out the nose, and are willing to spend some time learning the ins and outs of the program, I really can’t recommend it enough.
Consider this, after all: Say you want to learn something. Wouldn’t it be easier to learn it if you were able to hear yourself play with a close approximation of the tone of your learning material? And like I said, it’s easier to WRITE when you have the tone in your head actually coming into your ears.
Overall this software is a huge win and if you have the technical capacity and patience you’ll walk away with a wealth of great tones in your computer ready to go where you are.
-Pappy




